jennifer lopez 2011 on floor

images 2011 Jennifer Lopez Covers jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor
  • Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor



  • bskrishna
    07-22 04:07 PM
    so there should be 40-50k EB visas left over in this year...?





    wallpaper Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on
  • 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on



  • raghu112
    11-17 05:08 PM
    I totally agree. I did that 1 month back.

    Had kept new quota in octo. as deadline. No promising change there.. and I switched job to new employer.. better position, better compensation and better life.

    The new employer will start GC PERM labor after 6 months. I have 140 approved from old employer. So I believe I can transfer PD whenever new employer files 140.

    Cannot just wait for years waiting for PD to become current and ruin career.





    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. jennifer lopez 2011 on floor.
  • jennifer lopez 2011 on floor.



  • dkshitij
    07-12 04:33 PM
    if total demand will be insufficient to use all available numbers in a particular Employment preference category in a calendar quarter, then the otherwise unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits.

    Why don't we then see quarterly spillover?





    2011 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on
  • 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on



  • dummgelauft
    04-07 11:50 AM
    After reading this rumor mongering for a few weeks now, I have drawn a common between these cases (if we believe for a second that these stories ARE true). All these friend of a friend of a friend who were "sent back", seem to be working fro "desi" software "consultants". If that is indeed the case, then great work CIS. These shysters have no place in the EB queue anyways.

    (2) I doubt if CIS will risk having a lawsuit thrown at them by a Genuine American or mutlinational company if they "send bacK" their genuine H1B employee ( Do you think A place like Microsoft, Intel, GE or Boeing etc will take such treatment of their employee? No, they will sue CIS.

    (3) I work with H1B holders from OTHER countries too (lots of Russians and Chinese). None of them have ever "heard" any "friend of a friend" sent back.

    So, Cut the crap and do your work.



    more...


    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor
  • Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor



  • pappu
    05-07 11:25 AM
    I saw couple of them last week, now I searching, searching and searching, not able to see donor forums on updates except one that says "start of the donor forums".

    Is there a link that shows all donor forums...

    Looks like you contributed few minutes ago. You should be able to see the forums by tomorrow once we enter you in the system tonight.

    On http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/index.php
    you will see he 'donor forum' area as the first forum catagory once your status changes from member to donor.





    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez – I#39;m Into You
  • Jennifer Lopez – I#39;m Into You



  • nixstor
    07-05 01:35 PM
    I think IV should allow only paid members to create a new thread. Any non-paid member wants to create a new thread, then make them pay before creating one.

    Very decent idea. But Its very difficult to implement as we might have to some code tweaks. I myself am not a programmer. I remember Pappu or some one asking for PHP/My SQL help which I believe went unanswered.



    more...


    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor
  • Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor



  • mbawa2574
    02-15 02:03 PM
    Some ROW folks here suddenly are saying that they like country cap quotas and there are against IV agenda.Why in the first place there should be a country cap on EB immigration ? Is it not the best and brightest in the world ? If there is FIFO implemented, how can a person in ROW will be effected by India and China as long as they meet the standards and file their petition on time.





    2010 jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. 2011 Jennifer Lopez Covers
  • 2011 Jennifer Lopez Covers



  • va_il
    12-27 01:53 PM
    Munna Bhai
    I talked to Atty Murthy's office about the same issue. They said that
    they had couple of experience where I140 revoked. But USCIS honored
    the original PD. But atty says that its kinda grey area. They could insist
    that if I140 is revoked, new PD could be your change of employement date.
    It depends on the officer . Some of them could honor PD. Some of them insist to the newer PD. Or some other officer may flip a coin and chose one. It will all depend on your luck.

    good luck
    babu

    Does this mean a person with EAD has some risk moving to another job even after 6 months if old employer revokes I140?



    more...


    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. jennifer lopez 2011 pictures.
  • jennifer lopez 2011 pictures.



  • go_gc_way
    12-28 11:13 AM
    Thanks Boreal,Subba.

    I looked at the following sites
    1) www.aapkamanoranjan.com
    2) www.lokvani.com (This is a paper magazine as well).

    Wrote to the editors of lokvani, if they can post a classified , they do not have free classifieds. aapkamanoranjan, wont let me send them feedback or contact them.

    This is a good beginning. We have posted in several sites, having completed this we all will have completed a good effort for IV (INFACT FOR YOU)

    Can other members please come forward and list the sites that are regional in their cities and post in them .... 15 minutes and you will have contributed to this thread :-).

    What do you folks suggest, shall I change the thread name to something more attractive ...to get evrey one's one's attention on the Forum first. :-)





    hair 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez On The Floor
  • Jennifer Lopez On The Floor



  • bestia
    01-19 01:28 PM
    ...
    I did argue about the scenario if I ended up losing my passport and vital documents, which is why I had made copies. He shook his head and repeated the same - NO PHOTOCOPIES OF OFFICIAL US IMMIGRATION DOCUMENTS FOR PERSONAL USE.
    ....


    Presenting copies of your documents to government officials is not PERSONAL use. You could argue that. Personal use is if you would be playing monopoly with copies of your documents with your friends. But if you make a copy of US document for the intent to present to US official and not to misrepresent the original document, it is not "personal use" and it is not illegal. That's why lawyers are suggesting making and having copies.



    more...


    jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. wallpaper jennifer lopez 2011
  • wallpaper jennifer lopez 2011



  • sanju_dba
    08-11 11:02 AM
    Mr Path of Joy
    I am EB3 India working for a small company in construction design industry. I have enough experience, qualifications and degree for an EB2. But it is not as simple as you make it sound.
    A major part- 8 out of my 15 year experience in this field has been with this employer and although my employer supports me, they are simply not hiring and have been having a difficult time since 2007. So, they cannot file for an EB2 Labor.

    I cannot change jobs, since my qualifications and experience will put me in a different job-description and title which I cannot because of how AC21 interprets the laws.

    So it is not as white and black as you make it sound. Most EB3 folks started their process way early in their careers and have moved on since. Some of us have been waiting for 10 years and have been in the country for 15 or more years.
    Some started during the last recession in 2001-2002 when EB2 was in scrutiny and dates were current for all, most employers and lawyers were touting the EB3 route.

    Anycase, I do not expect you to understand our situation. So continue speeding on your path of joy.

    same boat here, i bet many others do so.
    back in 2003 when my friend insisted to have my GC file in EB2, my attorney filed in eb3 convicing me saying all are current why bother. ( praying a cleaner route to hell for that attorney ).





    hot Jennifer Lopez – On The Floor jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. makeup jennifer lopez 2011 on
  • makeup jennifer lopez 2011 on



  • ajthakur
    07-14 07:18 PM
    Why does the attorney have to be very competent if its a simple AC 21 case? I know people have applied for AC21 on their own. Will an attorney do something different? He will also send the same set of dcouments that I will? Pleaes help me here. I am not sure whether I should spend thousands of dollars on an attorney for something I could have done myself.

    ajthakur,
    Bottomline you need a competent attorney for answering this RFE and invoking AC-21.



    more...


    house Artist: Jennifer Lopez Feat jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez#39;s new
  • Jennifer Lopez#39;s new



  • pbojja
    12-10 11:45 AM
    With all the porting nonsense going on eb2 will move backward and eb3 will inch forward slowly. We might end up with eb2 and eb3 in 2002. congrats to all the people who ported, the only thing you accomplished is you made sure eb2 does not progress (it does not mean you have have moved forward by porting, it just means that you have made sure you have prevented original eb2 guys from getting green card), the people who ported wont gain any benefit but they will make it worse for everyone, they have to file a second i140 which will take at least another 1 year to clear and after 1 year when the ported 140's clear the eb2 will go back to 2002. You have also accomplished another great feat, DOL is going to make it impossible to file eb2 in IT jobs so even genuine people are screwed. Before people start giving red dots and justifying there porting I have an message for you, your behavior is no different from the people who did labor substitution, the end result was DOL ended labor substitution and the result of all this porting is DOL has made it impossible to get eb2 even for genuine cases. Just because others are doing it does not mean you can do it, obviously it is wrong therefore dol removed labor substitution and now dol is making it impossible to get eb2 for IT jobs even for genuine cases. 90 % of people doing this porting are desi consulting employees, they wine and complain about desi consulting companies as blood suckers (justifiably) but they themselves are bloodsuckers on the EB2 community by doing this eb3 to eb2 porting.

    Stop the non-sense . As if USCIS-DOL knows exactly how many portings are going on ..do you think all the movement of this dates make sense ? just check last year movements .. they have no theory no logic or no numbers they just move with no logic ... At the end of year they move to 2006 or 2007and back to 2003 next year ..

    I m EB2 2006 and I have no problems with portings ..go for it EB3 folks ..I know it will be a year or more process but worth it , I think EB3 early 2000 folks deserve GC than a 2006-2007 EB2 folks(Dont think you are genious just because you are EB2 ..we know we all do same jobs).

    I m ready for reds and dont care a bit .





    tattoo Jennifer Lopez – I#39;m Into You jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor
  • Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor



  • anilsal
    12-11 03:00 PM
    In my opinion, USCIS created this rule to disallow new applications such that they can deal with the countless backlogged apps for labor.

    If the change of rule does not need congress action, then why not explore this option of allowing filing I485 during retrogression?



    more...


    pictures Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. jennifer lopez 2011 on floor.
  • jennifer lopez 2011 on floor.



  • a_yaja
    12-28 03:25 PM
    Please excuse my ignorance,,but what is 529

    529 is a college savings program that lets you put in money for your children's education. All contributions to the 529 account grow tax free, as long as they are used for higher education (bachelor's and above). Currently, the contribution is not exempt from Federal Income tax, but in Ohio, the first $2000 is exempt from state income tax. If the money is used for anything else other than higher education, there is a 10% penalty and the withdrawal is taxed as ordinary income. I think you can get away with the 10% penalty if the designated child gets a scholarship.





    dresses makeup jennifer lopez 2011 on jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez Feat.
  • Jennifer Lopez Feat.



  • a_yaja
    12-28 03:05 PM
    You mean 529? Thanks of telling. I was planning to open an account for my kid's college.

    Are you sure they wont let you open an account even if the kid is american citizen by birth?

    Your kid has to be a US citizen/ GC holder. You don't need to be either - except tht you need to be a resident of US with SSN (not sure if you need to be a legal resident). I live in Ohio and I opend a 529 for my daughter.



    more...


    makeup jennifer lopez 2011 pictures. jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Artist: Jennifer Lopez Feat
  • Artist: Jennifer Lopez Feat



  • StarSun
    02-23 08:16 AM
    Thank you Vin13 and Sukhwinderd for keeping track of the air miles and carpool/hosting details.

    Members, please come forward with your generous donations to help fellow members mitigate costs associated with the advocacy efforts.





    girlfriend Jennifer Lopez - On The Floor jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Download Jennifer Lopez
  • Download Jennifer Lopez



  • prioritydate
    12-20 07:03 PM
    Please lookup 245(k).

    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001255----000-.html



    So basically if you are applying for employment based immigration adjustment of status(meaning I-485) under EB1 EB2 or EB3, (that's what they mean by paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of section 1153 (b) in the above text), and if you have not voilated status for over 180 days after your last legal entry into USA, and if you were in legal status at the time of applying for 485, then you may adjust status.

    Now, a really good idea would be that you disclose this whole thing at the time of filing 485 and also claim the benefit under section 245(k). Since its apparent that you have not done it, I would advise to leave it alone and dont dig up old graves.

    Consult an attorney for further advise, but dont go overboard in being Raja Harishchandra (the chronic truth teller) because frankly USCIS may not care about this and you can always claim the benefit under section 245(k).

    However, if USCIS finds out about this (which is very very unlikely) and if the officer is a very strict person, then they may create a case of wilful misrepresentation. That's because on form I-485, it says that "have you ever been out of status or illegal and if so, provide details". In that question, if you didnt disclose your past history of being out of status ( I am assuming you were out of status and not illegal) then basically, in theory, they can say that you wilfully misrepresented (basically lied to them) by hiding this.

    One option is to file an amendment to your I-485 and disclose this fact. That way, atleast they cannot make a case of wilfull misrepresentation. Nonetheless, remember, for them to find this out (about you not working and sitting at home) is difficult. Unless they somehow ask for your W-2 and paystubs for past 6-7 years and in that case it will be very easy for them to see that you were not working for 1 year.

    Consult an attorney and tell the attorney all the details. I am not a lawyer and you should always ask a lawyer for legal advise.

    Thanks for the clarification, Logiclife. I enter U.S in the first week of Feb, 2001. The economy was bad and I didn't manage to get a job. In fact, I didn't managed to get a job for a year. My then employer didn't revoked my H1B and the I-94 was valid until Oct, 2002. I didn't know that I was out of status till now. I don't remember seeing any section in I-485 form, asking for information about out of status. I did attach my previous H1-B approval notice(2000 -2002) while filing I-485. One thing I want to know is, did anyone got a query(RFE), asking to provide all W2 forms since their entry into this country? I am interested to know that.





    hairstyles wallpaper jennifer lopez 2011 jennifer lopez 2011 on floor. Jennifer Lopez Feat.
  • Jennifer Lopez Feat.



  • jonty_11
    12-12 04:13 PM
    USCIS is not a legislative body, they cannot pass a law. The Congress does. In order to change any existing laws Congress has to pass it and USCIS just implements it. So I do not think meeting USCIS will help. BTW what is DOS ?





    makemygc
    07-05 11:29 AM
    http://digg.com/politics/Reversal_Fr...ard_Applicants


    thank you

    URL Incorrect. Plz repost





    srkamath
    07-20 01:26 PM
    Here you go - conversion should not impact this as the number of LC approvals remains the same:

    Here are all the LC approvals for India in the last seven years.

    Year, Total LC Approved, Total India
    2007 85112 24573
    2006 79782 22298
    2005 6133 1350
    2004 43582 No Info
    2003 62912 No Info
    2002 79784 No Info
    2001 77921 No Info
    2000 70204 No Info

    Lets assume about 25% of pre-PERM LCs are India based on post-PERM data. Thus for fiscal 2004 (Oct 2003 thru Sep 2004) the total LC number is 43,852. Assume 25% of that to be India based on PERM data. That gives about 11,000 India LCs in 2004 alone (All EB categories combined). If you assume an average of 2.5 dependents then the number of visas required for all India EB categories for 2004 is 27,500 (11,000*2.5). The regular quota for EB2 and EB3 combined is only about 9,800. That means 17,700 visas have to come from somewhere. I dont think those many visas are remaining for this year. Be prepared to see FIFO thrown under the bus and approvals with PDs that are all over the place. Please critique this analysis without piling on. Thoughts?

    delax,

    There is a mistake in your numbers, thousands of cases applied for in 2005 were approved in 2006.
    If you look at the 2006 PERM Data Sheet, there are 7290 Approved, India cases with receipt dates in the year 2005.
    I'm assuming PD = PERM Receipt Date (correct me if i'm wrong)
    Similarly for 2006 in the 2007 tables.

    Therefore there are ~ 8700 - EB1, EB2, EB3 cases in 2005 and not 1350.



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment